Tuesday, November 11, 2025
Home Blog Page 35

Journalist Detained for Erroneous Report

This statement was originally published on mfwa.org on June 30, 2017.

Gendarmes in Guinea have arrested and detained a journalist for two days after he published what the authorities describe as “false information likely to cause public disorder.”

Amadou Sadjo Diallo, the correspondent of the online news portal, Guinee-matin.com in Lelouma, a town located about 515 kilometres from the capital, Conakry, was arrested by the gendarmes on the orders of the Prefect of the town, Mohamed Deen Camara.

The MFWA correspondent reported that some 60 people out of about 100 people who attended a naming ceremony on June 25, 2016, began throwing up and having running stomach after eating food served at the ceremony.

Diallo followed up the matter at the hospital where the victims had been sent for treatment and reported, citing a Red Cross source at the hospital, that it was a case of cholera. Shortly after the publication of Diallo’s report, the hospital authorities alerted him that it was rather a case of food poisoning. Consequently, the reporter revised the report to reflect the new information and rendered a public apology.

Nonetheless, the Prefect of the town, Mohamed Deen Camara, ordered the gendarmerie to arrest Diallo for ‘disturbing public order.’

The journalist was held for two days and released on June 28, 2017, following pleas by the traditional elders of the town.

The MFWA finds it regrettable that Diallo was arbitrarily detained because of an error in his report, despite the fact that he later admitted and rectified the error. We think that even if the journalist deserves some reproach, it lies within the mandate of the media regulator, Haute Autorité de la Communication (HAC), and such a reproach will certainly not include arrest and detention for two days. We appeal to the Guinean authorities including the HAC to take preemptive steps to ensure that such violations are not repeated.

 

Construction Workers Assault Reporter, Seize Recorder

This statement was originally published on mfwa.org on June 29, 2017.

A journalist from Otec FM in the Ashanti Region of Ghana has been attacked by workers at a construction site where he had gone to investigate complaints by local residents about the siting of a project meant for a fuel station.

Isaac Nsiah Foster was shoved around by the workers, allegedly led by the owner of the project, when they saw him surveying the site and taking notes in the morning of June 27, 2017. His phone and recorder were seized and his audio recordings were deleted.

The news editor of Otec FM, John Antwi-Boasiako, who confirmed the incident to MFWA, said it took the pleas of passers-by before the construction workers freed Foster and gave him back his equipment.

Antiwi-Boasiako revealed that since that incident, the station has been receiving anonymous phone calls threatening either the Management or Foster.

“We have reported the incident to the police and forwarded the recordings of the threatening messages to them as well. Yesterday (June, 28), the reporter was at the Sofoline Police Station to write his statement. We hope the police will be able to investigate the matter and bring the culprits to book,” Antwi-Boasiako.

The MFWA condemns the attack on Foster and commend the Management of Otec FM for standing by their reporter and reporting the matter to the police. We urge the police to do diligent investigation to ensure that justice is done.

Bullying of Journalists Covering Nigerian Presidency Disturbing

This statement was originally published on mfwa.org on June 15, 2017.

The Media Foundation for West Africa (MFWA) has observed with increasing dismay recent indignities meted out to journalists covering activities of Nigerian President, Muhammadu Buhari.

From the reception of the freed Chibok Girls and the expulsion of a reporter of The Punch newspaper from the State House, to the media blackout at the Air Force Base in Kaduna, the handlers of the president’s media protocols have shown a certain lack of regard for the press and its important complementary role in the governing process.

On April 24, Bashir Abubakar, the Chief Security Officer (CSO) attached to President Muhammadu Buhari, confiscated the accreditation tag of a reporter of The Punch newspaper, Lekan Adetayo and had the journalist marched out of the State House.

Before being thrown out, Adetayo was grilled by the CSO for about three hours and forced to write a detailed statement about earlier stories about the Presidency published by The Punch which the aides found to be uncomplimentary of the administration.

Although Special Advisor, Femi Adesina, later distanced the Presidency from the expulsion of the reporter, assuring that “President Buhari does not intend to muzzle the media in any way,” the sad treatment of journalists was repeated during the President’s reception of the freed Chibok Girls.

Acting on the official statement by the Senior Special Assistant to the President on Media and Publicity, Mallam Garba Shehu that the President would receive the Chibok Girls at 4.00 pm on May 10, 2017, the press corps started arriving at the State House two hours ahead of time.

Eventually, the military buses carrying the girls arrived three hours later than announced without the anxious journalists being given any excuse. To complete an evening of discourtesy towards the media, the gates were clanked shut in the face of the teeming journalists, with only the reporter and the cameraman from the state-owned Nigerian Television Authority, (NTA) and the personal photographer to the President being allowed access to the meeting.

When the president arrived home on March 2017 from a 49-day medical leave in London, his aides disallowed any interaction between him and the eagerly awaiting reporters at the Kaduna Air Force base, who were left bemused.

The three incidents cited above occurred within a space of three months, and are, therefore, too frequent to be glossed over. It is regrettable that an institution as important as the media should be handled so coarsely by the Presidency. The MFWA, therefore, urges the authorities at the State House to take immediate steps to remedy this situation and restore dignity and mutual goodwill to the relationship between the Presidency and the media in Nigeria.

Decision of Rwanda’s Electoral Commission to Vet Online Messages of Presidential Candidates Unacceptable – AFEX

The African Freedom of Expression Exchange (AFEX) is deeply concerned about the decision of the Electoral Commission of Rwanda to vet and approve the messages of presidential candidates before they are published on social media platforms.

The directive which was announced during a press conference held on May 26, 2017 is expected to take effect from July 14, 2017 the date set for the commencement of official campaign. Other campaign materials such as photographs are also to be submitted to the seven electoral commissioners at least 48 hours before publication.

According to a report by AFP, the Electoral Commission’s head, Mr. Kalisa Mbanda said on May 29, 2017 that the decision to review the messages is to ensure that the messages were not contrary to the country’s laws.

“We are asking candidates to present to us their messages, their drafts to verify that they are not against the law,” said Mbanda.

Mr. Mbanda added that messages that are not approved by the commission cannot be published.

AFEX finds the decision of Rwanda’s electoral commission highly unacceptable and uncalled for. It is indeed a blatant attempt to muzzle free speech ahead of the elections in the country. As clearly indicated in a statement by the Rwanda Utilities Regulatory Authority (RURA) on May 31, 2017, the EC does not have the “mandate to regulate or interrupt the use of social media by citizens.”

Article 38 of the Constitution of the Republic of Rwanda 2003, provides for respect for freedom of expression rights. Subjecting the messages of presidential hopefuls to vetting before publication amounts to censorship, which is inconsistent with the right to freedom of expression as guaranteed by the Rwandan constitution and other regional frameworks ratified by Rwanda.

While condemning the decision by the EC to vet and approve campaign messages of presidential candidates before they are published, AFEX commends RURA for publicly defending the rights of citizens and reaffirming “the right of citizens to express themselves on social media and other ICT platforms, while respecting existing laws” as contained in eh RURA’s statement.

AFEX urges the National Electoral Commission of Rwanda to stick to their constitutional mandate of conducting free and fair elections. All issues related to the media (including the internet) and general expression should be done in consultation with RURA and other relevant stakeholders to ensure that the elections are conducted peacefully and successfully without compromising the rights of Rwandese to express themselves and actively participate in their own governance.

Zimbabwe: New Censorship Board to ‘regulate and control’ Media

This statement was originally published on zimbabwe.misa.org on May 24, 2017.

A new Board of Censors has been put in place to regulate and control the media and film industry in the digital era.

According to The Herald edition of 24 May 2017, the Minister of Home Affairs, Ignatius Chombo, made the appointment in terms of the Censorship and Entertainment Controls  Act.

The minister said while the Constitution provides for free artistic expression, cultural beliefs and association, it was in the same vein, the board’s constitutional responsibility to ensure these same freedoms are reasonably limited to curb infringement of other people’s rights.

 MISA Zimbabwe’s position

 While the minister said the new board had been entrusted with safeguarding people’s rights and trusts, this can only be achieved by amending or repealing  offensive sections of the Act which are inconsistent with the country’s 2013 Constitution.

Some of the objectionable provisions on the regulation, censorship or state-control of the mass media  and other forms of private or public entertainment, fall under Sections 13 and 14 of the Act.

For instance, Section 13 makes use of wide and subjective parameters in the constitution of offences pertaining to pictures, statutes or publication of material that is indecent, obscene and offensive as  undesirable content to public morals.

The determination  of what is indecent and offensive is not clearly defined. This leaves the Censorship Board with wide and unfettered discretion on what is undesirable as provided for under Section 14. The Board’s powers should be narrowed to at least match the limitations that are spelt out in the Constitution of Zimbabwe.

Sections 13 and 14 of the Act should therefore be repealed as they are inconsistent with constitutional rights to freedom of expression, media freedom and access to information and other regional and international instruments voluntarily ratified by Zimbabwe.

MFWA, Stakeholders to Discuss Digital Gender Gap in Ghana

This statement was originally published on mfwa.org on May 22, 2017.

Stakeholders from government, telecommunications industry, academia, civil society organisations, media and the general public will on Wednesday, May 24, 2017 converge at Kofi Annan Centre of Excellence in ICT in Accra at 9am to deliberate on the way forward in closing the digital gender gap in Ghana.

The forum themed, Promoting and Protecting Women’s Rights Online – The Role of Stakeholders, follows a Report on Women’s Rights Online in Ghana developed by the Media Foundation for West Africa (MFWA) and the Web Foundation. The Report highlights the performance of Ghana in bridging the digital gender gap with specific recommendations for various stakeholders.

Target eight of Sustainable Development Goal 5 calls for the “use of enabling technology, in particular information and communications technology [ICT], to promote the empowerment of women.” In spite of this global goal, Ghana scored 30 percent in the areas of internet access, digital skills, affordability, relevant content and online safety in the Report on Women’s Rights Online in Ghana.

The stakeholders’ forum will, therefore, seek to address how the challenges identified in the areas of internet access, digital skills, affordability, relevant content and online safety can be overcome through the support and collaboration of government and other stakeholders.

The forum will be addressed by the Minister of Communication, Hon. Ursula Owusu-Ekufful, and the Deputy Minister of Gender, Children and Social Protection, Hon Gifty Twum Ampofo.

The Stakeholders’ Forum on Women’s Rights Online in Ghana is being organised by the MFWA with funding support from the Web Foundation.

Ending Impunity: Court Issues Arrest Warrant for Suspects of Deyda Hydara’s Murder

This statement was originally published on mfwa.org on May 19, 2017.

A Magistrates’ court in the Gambian capital, Banjul has issued an arrest warrant for the suspected killers of prominent Gambian Journalist and founder of independent Point Newspaper, Deyda Hydara.

The court issued the warrant for the arrest of a Former Army Commander, Kawsu Camara, and Major Sanna Manjang, an alleged assassin (popularly referred to as jungler) of former dictator Yahya Jammeh.

The Principal Magistrate of the Court, Isatou Janneh-Njie issued the arrest warrant after police accused the two for the murder of Hydara and filed an application for their arrest.

Deyda Hydara, then editor of The Point newspaper and a well-known critic of Yahya Jammeh was gunned down in a drive-by shooting by unknown assailants on his way from work on December 16, 2004. Prior to his death, Hydara was the president of the Gambia Press Union (GPU) and led advocacy efforts against legislative restrictions on press freedom in the country.

After Hydara’s murder, the state opened an investigation which was closed after 22 days. No arrests were made and no one was held responsible for the murder. The government silenced media who spoke about Hydara’s murder and also attempted to vilify him. In an interview on the state-owned Gambian Radio and Television Stations (GRTS) on June 9, 2009, ex-president Yahya Jammeh said Hydara’s gruesome murder was as a “result of personal revenge by a jealous husband, whose wife committed adultery with Hydara.”

On November 23, 2011 Hydara’s family together with the International Federation of Journalists-Africa filed a suit at the ECOWAS Court against The Gambia.

At the trial, Captain Lamin K. Saine a senior official NIA who was the head of the team that conducted investigations into Hydara’s murder testified as their witness. He defended the NIA investigations and said it was prompt, independent, and that the NIA had included the family. Saine also admitted that the NIA dedicated only 22 days to investigating Hydara’s murder.

On June 10, 2014, the Court found the Gambian government guilty of failing to properly investigate Hydara’s murder. The Court ordered the Gambian government to pay $50,000 in damages Hydara’s family and $10,000 as legal costs. The state is yet to comply with the Court’s judgment.

The MFWA welcomes this news of the issuance of the arrest warrant for the suspects and hopes that this will be a step towards ensuring justice for Hydara and his family.

Uganda Police in Brutal Arrest of Journalists on world Press Freedom Day

This statement was originally published on hrnjuganda.org on May 4, 2017.

As Uganda joined the rest of the world to commemorate The World Press Freedom Day through different activities; some journalists were arrested by the police and kept in the cells for trying to organize parallel activities to those of their association, the Uganda Journalists Association (UJA).

The arrested journalists included; Phillip Onyango, Issa Kigongo –Deputy Secretary who had again been arrested the previous day at the Central Police Station and released later, Bukenya Ronald, Mukisa Daniel, Kabuye Ronald, Nakabale Issa and Atusingwize Johan. They were arrested in the capital Kampala as they matched to their intended venue for the day’s celebrations. The journalists accused a rivalry UJA group of masterminding their arrest.

The journalists told HRNJ-Uganda that they had informed the police about their intended celebration activities. “We wrote to police on 20th April, 2017 about our plans for the day, but we were surprised when it turned against us and roughed us up as though it was illegal for us to have parallel activities.” Kigongo said.

The journalists decried the manner in which they were arrested. “I was brutally arrested by the police, they tore my trousers and I sustained a cut on my head. They also confiscated my property including a cell phone.” Nakabaale told HRNJ-Uganda at CPS

The arrest attracted wild condemnation from the civil society, human rights bodies and journalists, among others. The arrest came just a day after a local media rights body –Human Rights Network for Journalists-Uganda had released a Press Freedom Index for 2016 titled Tough Times, Political Instability stifles Media Freedom’. The Report documented a total of 135 cases of violation and abuse, with police ranked as the leading perpetrator with 83 cases (61%). Police has been ranked as the leading media freedom violators by local and international rights bodies for several years now.

The seven journalists were charged with unlawful assembly vide SD Ref 13/03/05/2017 and released on bond. They were asked to re-appear before the DPC of the Central Police Station on Thursday 04th May, 2017.

The Kampala Metropolitan Police spokesperson, Emillian Kayima dismissed claims that police was acting under the influence of one of the UJA factions. He said the journalists were released without any charges preferred against them.

“It is unfortunate that the police goes ahead to brutally arrest journalists on a day they are free to celebrate press freedom. Police should do better to ensure the safety and security of journalists, and also maintain neutrality at all times. Journalists need to work together for the greater good of defending our freedom.’ Said the HRNJ-Uganda National Coordinator, Robert Ssempala

 

AFEX Members in Nigeria Call on Government to Ensure Enabling Environment for Media Practice

This statement was originally published on ipcng.org on May 3, 2017.

On the occasion of the World Press Freedom Day 2017, a coalition of media advocacy organizations in Nigeria under the aegis of the Partnership for Media and Democracy in Nigeria (PAMED) is calling on the Federal Government to create an enabling environment for media practice in the country.

PAMED, made up of the Institute for Media and Society (IMS), the International Press Centre (IPC), and Media Rights Agenda (MRA), noted that the legal and policy environment for the practice of journalism in Nigeria was not conducive, adding  that there is an urgent need to address the issue to ensure that journalists do not become  endangered species in Nigeria.

Saying that it is worried at the abysmal state of media freedom in Nigeria, PAMED noted that Reporters Without Borders (Reporters sans Frontières RSF), the Paris, France based freedom of expression organization  ranked Nigeria 122 out of 180 countries in its 2017 World Press Freedom Index released on April 16, 2017.

PAMED described the situation as appalling, noting that the government’s non-challant attitude to investigating attacks on journalists and bringing perpetrators to justicehas fueled impunity by perpetrators since they are invariably never brought to justice.

PAMED said from the murder of Dele Giwa on October 19, 1986 till date, no perpetrator in all the cases of journalists murdered in Nigeria has been apprehended, tried or brought to book as virtually all of them have gone free.

Observing that the shooting to death at his residence of Mr. Famous Giobaro, a Desk Editor with the Bayelsa State owned Glory FM 97.1in the early hours of April 16, 2017 by unidentified gunmen, was the latest in a series of such incidents, it said that it was tragic that the perpetrators of this heinous act may also never be found or brought to justice.

PAMED called on the government to make a public commitment to fully implement the UN Plan of Action on the Safety of Journalists and the Issue of Impunity to stem the ugly tide.

It also called on the government to take decisive measures to combat impunity for crimes against journalists, including bystrengthening UN mechanisms; cooperating with member States; partnering with other organizations and institutions; raising awareness; sensitizing and training security and law enforcement agencies to investigate cases; and fostering safety initiatives.

For further information, please contact

Ayode Longe

[email protected]

Signed:

Dr. AkinAkingbulu

Executive Director, Institute for Media and Society (IMS)

Lanre Arogundade

Director, International Press Centre (IPC)

Edetaen Ojo

Executive Director, Media Rights Agenda

 

Essential Freedoms, Essential Work

This statement was originally published on ifex.org on April 28, 2017.

3 May is World Press Freedom Day. As IFEX enters its 25th year as a global network defending the right to freedom of expression and information, Annie Game speaks to what is new – and what remains a constant – when it comes to defending freedom of the press.

Is press freedom an out-dated idea? Given 2017’s post-truth, print-is-dead, traditional-media-aren’t-viable, facts-are-negotiable environment, what is it, exactly, that we are defending now? Is the fight still worth it? Is victory possible?

IFEX was founded in 1992, with press freedom at the core of our mission. The United Nations General Assembly proclaimed 3 May World Press Freedom Day less than a year later. At that time, the online environment was in its infancy, and press freedom seemed a clear goal, with obvious markers of success and challenge.

Since then, IFEX and its more than 100 member organisations around the globe have strategised and networked to tackle a diverse and expanding range of free expression issues: press freedom as well as privacy, digital security, the right to assembly, access to information, freedom of artistic expression and more.

Is press freedom still relevant? Clearly, those who oppose justice and accountability understand its importance; otherwise they would not continue to viciously and unrelentingly attack journalists and human rights activists who seek to bring the truth to light. While today’s media landscape is fragmented, a free press is more essential than ever, in uncovering abuses of power, in defending human rights, in shining light into corners governments, corporations and non-state actors might prefer that citizens not see.

Is victory possible? It is a common human tendency to believe that our current circumstances are uniquely difficult, that 2017’s challenges are uniquely complex. It’s the kind of thinking that can quickly lead to despair, because it suggests that the solutions and strategies that will help us prevail are without precedent, that we must create them anew.

Nevertheless, while new ideas, new understanding and new tactics must be developed, some things are constants: we know that mutual support, amplification of each other’s messages and tireless defense of our most marginalized and most targeted communities is at the heart of the work that we do in defending freedom of expression – the work that we must continue to do. It is work that requires resistance and resilience, skills that IFEX members have developed and used to power their efforts every day, every year, often under difficult circumstances.

We’ve learned a lot in IFEX’s two and a half decades, most notably that press freedom isn’t a single attainable goal. It is part of a web of interconnected rights and responsibilities that must be nurtured, developed, defended and expanded. But a free press is an essential thread in that web. And that’s why on World Press Freedom Day, it is important not only to recognise those who have sacrificed greatly to defend our right to press freedom, it is essential to recommit ourselves to the fight – and to each other.

You can read more about World Press Freedom Day at UNESCO.org.

AFEX Welcomes Restoration of Internet Access in Cameroon, Urges Government to Release all Arbitrarily Detained

0

The African Freedom of Expression Exchange (AFEX) welcomes the restoration of internet connectivity in the North-west and South-west regions of Cameroon after 94 days of network shutdown.

The Ministry of Post and Telecommunications, on April 20, 2017 under the orders of  the President of Cameroon, Paul Biya, restored internet connection to the people of the two regions after three months of network disruption.

The government of Cameroon shutdown internet access in the two regions following protests against the government’s imposition of the use of French language in the two predominantly Anglophone regions.

 Since protests erupted in November 2016, freedom of expression and human rights have been repressed by the Cameroonian government, four protesters have been killed and several others have been arbitrarily arrested and detained.

While welcoming the restoration of internet access in the two regions, AFEX also calls on the Cameroonian government to commit to promoting and protecting digital rights as network disruptions adversely affect people socially, psychologically, economically, educationally and politically. For instance, the 94 days of internet shutdown has deprived about 7 million citizens access to information and has resulted in the loss of about U.S. $ 4.5 million in a country with a per capita income of about $1,200.

The restoration of internet access should be the first step towards redressing all outstanding human rights violations in the two regions. AFEX therefore calls on the Cameroonian government to release all those who have been arrested and detained in connection with the protests and resort to dialogue.

AFEX takes this opportunity to commend all local, regional and international bodies and organisations, for being steadfast and actively engaged in the campaign for internet restoration in Anglophone Cameroon. The solidarity with the Cameroonian people and commitment towards campaigning against any form of network disruption is laudable and must be sustained.

AFEX Condemns Gruesome Killing of Journalist by Unknown Assailants in Nigeria

0

The African Freedom of Expression Exchange (AFEX) joins its member, the International Press Centre (IPC), based in Lagos-Nigeria to strongly denounce the gruesome murder of Famous Giobaro, a journalist working with Glory FM, Bayelsa State-owned radio station.

According to IPC, unidentified gunmen shot and killed Giobaro on April 16, 2017 at his residence in Yenagoa, a local government area in the Bayelsa State in Nigeria.

Giobaro, who worked as a Desk Editor in the station, was reportedly shot several times in the stomach. The gunmen left without stealing anything. According to reports, the gunmen gained access into Giobaro’s house with the help of a ladder after cutting the barbwires.

In a statement issued by IPC, the Director, Lanre Arogundade, said that the killing of the journalist brings to fore serious concerns for the safety of journalists in Nigeria.

“We are calling on the Bayelsa State Government to show commitments and investigate the alleged assassination of Journalist Giobaro who is a staff of the state government. This is one incident that should not be allowed to lie low and we also call on the Inspector General of Police to investigate the matter with a sense of urgency,” Arogundade stated.

No reason was given for the murder of the journalist at the time of issuing this statement.

AFEX backs IPC’s call and sends forth its profound condolences to the bereaved family and friends left behind.

We are appalled by the brutal killing of Famous Giobaro and we urge authorities of Nigeria’s police service to investigate expeditiously into this matter and ensure that the perpetrators of this gruesome act are apprehended and brought to book.

AFEX appeals to the government of Nigeria to put in place measures to ensure that violators of freedom of expression rights are punished to serve as deterrent to others. Journalists and media professionals working in the country must be free to carry out their work in a safe environment.