Wednesday, May 13, 2026
Home Blog Page 27

Governments Increasingly Penalising Critical Journalism in Africa

0

The right to freedom of expression and access to information is enshrined in the national constitutions of several African countries who are also signatories to other regional and International frameworks such as the African Charter on Human and People’s Rights, Universal Declaration on Human Rights and the International Covenant on Civic and Political Rights.

However, a series of press freedom violations in five countries in Central, East and Southern Africa recorded since January 2019 appears to call into doubt governments’ commitment to upholding the above frameworks. Within the period under reference, four journalists have been arbitrarily arrested and detained, another journalist sentenced to a year in prison while one media house has been suspended for critical reportage about state officials.

In the latest incident recorded by the African Freedom of Expression Exchange (AFEX), state security agents on March 21, 2019 arrested and detained Zenzele Ndebele, a civil society activist and freelance journalist at the central police station in Harare. Ndebele’s arrest followed the discovery of used teargas canisters after police searched his car when he arrived at the State House for a meeting between President Emmerson Mnangagwa and civil society organisations in Zimbabwe. Ndebele explained that he had picked up the canisters, which had been fired by the police, during the last public protest in January which he was filming.

However, the police dismissed his explanation and charged him with “possession of offensive weapons at public gatherings,” under Section 43 of Zimbabwe’s Criminal Law Code.

According to the Zimbabwe chapter of MISA, Ndebele’s home and office were also raided. Sautsani Ali, the cameraman of the activist was also briefly detained. Meanwhile Ndebele himself was freed and all charges dropped against him after appearing in court earlier today (March 22, 2019).

Still in Southern Africa, military officers on January 5, 2019 arrested Mozambican journalist, Amade Abubacar who works with state-owned community radio station, Rádio e Televisao Comunitária Nacedje de Macomia (Community Radio and Television of Macomia). The journalist was arrested by military officials while he was photographing internally displaced people fleeing from terrorist attacks in the Cabo Delgado region located in northern Mozambique into Macomia. The Cabo Delgado region has faced invasions by unidentified groups since October 2017.  

Abubacar appeared before court on January 18, 2019 and was denied bail. He has since been in detention without any charges brought against him. According to local media report, Abubacar has been subjected to inhumane treatment including torture and is being denied food while at the Cabo Delgado detention centre. .

Another journalist, from the same community radio station where Abubacar works, Germano Daniel Adriano was also arrested on February 18, 2019 by military personnel in the same region for covering similar attacks against residents of that part of the country.  According to a statement from AFEX member, Mozambique chapter of the Media Institute of Southern Africa (MISA), both journalists have since been charged with “violation of state secrets using a computer” and “public instigation to crime using a computer”.

The arbitrary arrest and detention of journalists continued, this time in Sudan, where, on February 22, 2019, agents of the feared National Intelligence and Security Service (NISS) arrested and detained incommunicado Osman Mirghani, editor-in-chief of the independent Sudanese newspaper, Al-Tayyar. Although no charges have been brought against Mirghani, the authorities have continued to detain him. The journalist’s ordeal is believed to be in connection with comments he made that seemed to support the ongoing anti-government protests in Sudan.

According to AFEX sources in Sudan, Mirghani’s health is deteriorating as he is unable to access adequate medical attention while in detention.

While his colleague’s in Mozambiaque and Sudan are languishing in detention without trial, Steeve Mwanyo Iwewe, a journalist who works with Radio-Television Sarah (RTS) in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC), was on March 1, 2019, sentenced to a year in prison after a ‘hasty’ trial by the Mbandaka Peace Tribunal. Iwewe, who was accused of “insulting” Bobo Boloko Bolumbu, the governor of the north-western province of Ecuador was also ordered to pay a fine of $200 to the complainant.

Iwewe was arrested on February 27, 2019 for defying the governor’s orders to stop covering a public protest in the province.   

“You came here to do your work, let me also do mine freely (…)”, the journalist reportedly told the governor in response to the latter’s orders, a remark the official felt to be insulting.

The governor’s order clearly amounted to censorship and a violation of Article 24 of the Congolese Constitution which guarantees press freedom. Iwewe’s incarceration betrays serious gaps in the Congolese criminal justice system.

Unlike the three cases reported above which involved journalists, the fifth violation which was recorded in Zambia targeted a critical media outlet. Again, unlike the earlier cases where security agents were the major perpetrators of the violations, this time the violator was the Independent Broadscasting Authority (IBA), the institution mandated to regulate and protect the media in Zambia. On March 4, 2019 the IBA ordered the suspension Prime Television for 30 days after it accused the station of exhibiting “unprofessionalism in its broadcasting.”

Prior to its suspension, Prime TV station was subjected to series of attacks including verbal and physical assaults from high ranking government officials following the station’s reportage of the recent parliamentary by-elections in Sesheke which was marred by violence.

The above incidents highlight the increasing intolerance of independent and critical journalism by some governments on the continent. The African Freedom of Expression Exchange (AFEX) is deeply concerned about the above incidents and condemns the increasing rate at which governments on the continent are quick to penalise journalists who are critical of their policies or practices.

We call on the states concerned to unconditionally release the journalists being held in their countries. We urge African governments generally to respect the right to freedom of expression and divergent opinion in line with their obligation under their national constitutions and other regional and international frameworks to which they are signatories.

AFEX appeals to security agencies to do their work independently and professionally by resisting illegal orders from the Executive to perpetrate violations against journalists and activists.

AFEX also urges the judiciary of the various countries to uphold press freedom and human rights by rejecting frivolous charges against journalists and dissidents.

AFEX Calls on Authorities in Sudan to Unconditionally Release Journalist Osman Mirghani

0

The African Freedom of Expression Exchange (AFEX) demands the release of Sudanese journalist, Osman Mirghani who has been in detention without charge for the past 26 days.

Agents of Sudan’s feared, National Intelligence and Security Service (NISS) on February 22, 2019 arrested Mirghani who is the editor-in-chief of the independent Sudanese newspaper, Al-Tayyar.

According to AFEX sources in Sudan, the health of the journalist is deteriorating as he is unable to access adequate medical attention while in detention.

Although no charges have been brought against him, it is believed that his arrest is in connection with comments he made about the ongoing protests in the country. According to media reports, Mirghani was arrested shortly after he said in an interview that the current protests could result in Al-Bashir’s removal from office. The said comments were made during an interview he granted on the Abu Dhabi-based Sky News Arabia network in Abu Dhabi.

Mirghani was detained incommunicado until last week Wednesday, March 13, 2019 when his family was allowed to see him for the first time since his arrest. AFEX’s contact, who pleaded anonymity, indicated that Mirghani’s health and safety was at risk.

“Now we are concerned about his health and even his life because we are not certain about the conditions of the prison where he is being kept.”

It is alleged that Mirghani is being detained at a facility where political prisoners are usually held by the NISS.

This is the second time the journalist is being targeted for being critical of the government. On December 15, 2015, Mirghani was arrested and detained together with the editor of Al-Saiha newspaper after they criticised the Sudanese government in their publication.  

The incarceration of Osman Mirghani for exercising his constitutionally guaranteed right to free expression violates Article 39 of the 2005 Interim Constitution of Sudan as well as provisions of regional and international frameworks including Article 19 of the Universal Declaration on Human Rights (UDHR).

Mirghani’s case provides further evidence of the deteriorating freedom of expression situation in Sudan since protests broke out in December 2018 resulting in increased violations such as arbitrary arrest and detention of journalists and protesters, police brutalities against protesters including killing, Internet shutdown and confiscation of newspaper publications.  

AFEX joins the global community to condemn the arbitrary detention of Mirghani and call on the government to immediately and unconditionally release him. We also urge President Omar Al-Bashir to uphold the fundamental rights of the people of Sudan during the crisis and at all times.

80 Press Freedom Organisations across the Globe Call on AU/UN Special Rapporteurs to Intervene in Ongoing Social Media Blackout in Chad

Eighty freedom of expression and media rights organisations across the world have called on the African Union (AU) Special Rapporteur on Freedom of Expression and Access to Information and the United Nations (UN) Special Rapporteur on the promotion and protection of the right to Freedom of Opinion and Expression to intervene to end the long-running social media blackout in Chad.

In a petition signed on Tuesday March 12, 2019, the press freedom organisations said since March 28, 2018, mobile operators in Chad have, on the orders of the government, blocked access to social media platforms including Twitter, Facebook and WhatsApp.

The petitioners alleged that the shutdown is aimed at quelling public protests across the country by undermining citizens’ capacity to mobilise through the power of the Internet and social media platforms, which is in breach of Chadians’ freedom of expression online and the right to access information.

The 80 signatories to the petition noted that the social media shutdown in Chad, which is now the longest network disruption in Africa, violates several resolutions including the African Commission on Human and People’s Rights (ACHPR) Resolution, ACHPR Res. 362 (LIX) 2016 which condemns the “emerging practice of State Parties interrupting or limiting access to telecommunication services such as the internet, social media and messaging services.”

The petitioners lamented that  while the eleven month-old social media blackout has grounded the activities of students, schools and businesses that rely on the internet, the government of President Idriss Deby has refused to heed several calls to end the shutdown. 

“Repeated appeals by local, regional and international rights groups on the Idriss Deby-led administration to restore access to social media platforms have proved futile”, the petitioners said.

They therefore called on the African Union’s (AU) Special Rapporteur on Freedom of Expression and Access to Information, Lawrence Murugu Mute and the United Nations Special Rapporteur on Freedom of Opinion and Expression, David Kaye to intervene to ensure that access to social media is restored in Chad.     

Kindly click on the hyperlinks to access the petitions addressed to the AU Special Rapporteur, Commissioner Mute and the UN Special Rapporteur, David Kaye respectively,

AFEX Condemns Imprisonment of Journalist in DRC for “Insulting” Governor

0

The African Freedom of Expression Exchange (AFEX) and its member in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC), Journaliste en Danger (JED) denounce the sentencing of a journalist working with Radio-Television Sarah (RTS).

According to JED, the Mbandaka Peace Tribunal on Friday, March 1, 2019, sentenced Steeve Mwanyo Iwewe to a year in prison for “insulting” the governor of Ecuador, a province located north-west of the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC). Iwewe was also asked to pay a fine of $200 to the complainant.

The incident dates back to February 27, 2019 when Iwewe was covering demonstrations by officers of the Environmental Coordination council in the province, who were demanding the local government to absorb 5% of the cost of their operations.

Upon arrival at the scene of demonstration, the governor of the area, Bobo Boloko Bolumbu inquired about the situation and ordered one of his aides to prevent the journalist (Iwewe) from filming the demonstrations.

The journalist resisted and asked the governor to allow him carry out his journalistic work freely.  

“You came here to do your work, let me also do mine freely (…)”, he reportedly told the governor.  

Iwewe’s remarks angered the governor who ordered the police officers present to arrest him.

The police physically assaulted Steeve Mwanyo Iwewe and detained him at the Mbankak central police station for a few hours. He was transferred to the Mbandaka High Court the same day for trial. However, following the intervention of Iwewe’s lawyers, the case was canceled.  The lawyers cited procedural flaws with regard to the arrest and the inhuman treatment inflicted on their client. Steeve Mwanyo Iwewe was taken to Mbandaka Central Prison where he was detained, until March 1, 2019 when he was sentenced to 12 months in prison.

Three other journalists working with the same television station, Trésor Nsaebeinga, Yannick Vital Mbombo and Jean-Claude Mafundisho told JED that they have been in hiding since February 28, 2019 for fear of reprisals. They added that their homes were visited on the evening of February 27 (the same day Iwewe was arrested) by police officers with arrest warrants following another complaint to the Mbandaka District Prosecutor’s Office by provincial governor for similar charges.

AFEX joins JED to firmly condemn this flagrant act of injustice against the journalist. Locking up a journalist for 12 months in prison for insisting on his constitutionally guaranteed right to cover a public event as a journalist betrays serious gaps in the Congolese criminal justice system. This is a flagrant abuse of authority by the governor to silence the media, which AFEX condemns in no ambiguous terms.

We call on the presiding judge overturn the decision and release Iwewe so he can continue his journalistic work freely and safely.

AFEX urges journalists in DRC to rise up against this act of repression against their colleague and call for the journalist.

AFEX Calls on Zambia’s Media Regulator to Reinstate Prime Television

The African Freedom of Expression Exchange (AFEX) together with its member, MiSA Zambia, is dismayed at the decision of the country’s media regulatory body, the Independent Broadcasting Authority (IBA) to suspend privately owned, Prime Television.

The IBA on March 1, 2019 summoned the management of the TV station to respond to allegations of ‘biased’ reporting levelled against the station by the ruling PF party during Parliamentary by-elections held in Sesheke, a town located in the western province of Zambia. The IBA also ordered the management to render an apology to the Secretary General of the PF party within 14 days.

However, on March 4, 2019, three days after Prime TV was summoned, the IBA at a press briefing announced the suspension of the licence of the TV station for 30 days with immediate effect. Announcing the suspension, the Director General and Board Secretary of the IBA, Josephine Mapoma said the licence of Prime TV had been revoked for exhibiting “unprofessionalism in its broadcasting” through unbalanced coverage, opinionated news material, likely to incite violence and use of derogatory language.

The IBA also indicated it had suspended the licence of Valley FM for 60 days, revoked licences of two other radio stations and issued about 20 licences to different media outlets across Zambia. 

Prime Television has been subjected to series of attacks such as verbal and physical assaults from affiliates of PF party including high ranking government officials following the station’s reportage of the Sesheke parliamentary by-elections.

AFEX finds the decision of the IBA which is supposed to be the mediator in resolving the conflict between the TV station and the disgruntled officials of the PF party as hasty, targeted and censoring.

Suspending Prime TV for 30 days means denying citizens who rely on the station to be informed their fundamental right to freedom of expression and access to information which is enshrined in Article 20 of the country’s constitution as well as other regional and international frameworks.

The AFEX network considers it worrying that the IBA is suspending Prime TV after the Deputy Media Director of the PF party, Antonio Mwanza, was quoted a few weeks ago by an online blog, saying the media regulator had been directed to revoke the licence of the station .

 AFEX and MiSA Zambia maintain that the IBA is supposed to be independent of any form of influence from any quarters including the ruling government. It is therefore disturbing that it appears the IBA is being used as a tool to silence media houses whose reportage are contrary to the views of the ruling government.  

We denounce the suspension of Prime TV as an affront to press freedom. AFEX calls on the Independent Broadcasting Authority (IBA) to reinstate the station and allow it to carry out its constitutional duty of informing the public.

Critical Private TV Station under Attack from State Officials in Zambia

The African Freedom of Expression Exchange (AFEX) firmly condemns the recent attacks by affiliates of Zambia’s ruling, Patriotic Front (PF) party against Prime Television based in the capital, Lusaka.

The privately owned TV station has come under attack following its reportage on the Sesheke parliamentary by-elections.

On January 26, 2019, the Secretary General of the ruling Patriotic Front (PF) party, Davies Mwila, dismissed Prime TV reporters from a press briefing he was addressing. He also declared publicly that Prime Television is barred from covering all activities of his political party. The comments by the Secretary General of PF have has incited cadres of the party against journalists working with the TV station.

In the most recent attacks against the station, a group of young people believed to be a pro-PF vigilante group reportedly attacked three reporters of the station in separate incidents within a space of two weeks.  On February 14, 2019, members of the vigilante group attacked Wells Chifunda who is a court reporter for Prime TV. Six days prior to the above incident, the supporters of the party on February 8, 2019, physically assaulted and confiscated a laptop belonging to Lyold Kapusa, a reporter for Prime TV while another reporter, Kazela Habwanda of the TV station was also attacked by the group in a separate incident on February 5.

Some state actors also encouraged these attacks by openly antagonising the media outlet in their public pronouncements. On February 13, 2019, the Minister of Information and Broadcasting, Dora Siliya at a press briefing accused Prime TV of reporting the violent incidents that happened during Parliamentary By Elections in Sesheke, a town located in the western province of Zambia in a sensational manner.

The Deputy Media Director of the PF party, Antonio Mwanza, was also quoted by an online blog, TP News, on February 13, 2019 as saying that “Prime TV must be closed down…the IBA [the media regulator] has already been directed to revoke the licence….”

Following the hostile declarations by these powerful officials, the Independent Broadcasting Authority (IBA) on February 15, 2019, sent Prime TV a letter requesting for the station’s editorial policy and broadcast recordings of its political show, News Bulletin and Oxygen of Democracy Programme. The request followed a complaint by the Secretary General of PF party accused Prime TV of biased and unethical reportage in the said political news bulletin.

Also, the Minister for Lands and Natural Resources, Jean Kapata, a senior political party official of the PF party threatened to cause an attack on Prime TV. Kapata was quoted saying “to Prime TV, we are not warning you we are telling you that if you continue this type of reports, disparaging the government day in day out, these women that you are seeing here shall come and close down your studio.”

The IBA again on February 28, 2019 summoned the management of Prime TV and demanded that the station renders an apology to the Secretary General of the PF party within 14 days for alleged biased reporting on the party.

Richard Mulonga, Founder of Bloggers of Zambia indicated that the decision by the ruling party to ban Prime TV from covering all its activities will deny the stations’ viewers access to updates with regards to implementation of government policies.

“We are worried because the decision by the PF to ban Prime Television from reporting on the activities of the ruling PF party contravenes provisions of our national constitution and it is an affront to the right to freedom of expression and access to information of the people of Zambia.”

AFEX is concerned about the concerted attacks on Prime TV by cadres and officials of the ruling PF party in Zambia. We also deplore the complicity of the media regulator, IBA in these attacks that are obviously calculated to silence the critical media house.

Prime TV, like any other media outlet in Zambia, has a constitutionally guaranteed right to carry out its journalistic work freely and without interference from any quarters. The hostility to which Prime TV has been subjected is therefore an affront to article 20 of Zambia’s republican constitution.

Zambia’s governance system is hinged on the principle of democracy where freedom of expression is critical to citizens’ participation in the country’s governance processes. It is in line with this principle that AFEX is urging officials of the PF party to cease its intolerant attitude towards divergent views and opinions from critical media outlets in Zambia.

Additionally, we call upon the IBA to be a true regulator of the broadcasting media in Zambia and avoid being viewed as a tool that is used by the ruling class to settle scores with media houses whose publications they find uncomfortable.

We also urge the media to remain professional and committed to promoting the public’s interest at all times.

AFEX Joins Global Press Freedom Organisations Urging Nigeria to Keep the Internet on during Election Period

0

The African Freedom of Expression Exchange (AFEX) has joined other global press freedom organisations to call on the government of Nigeria to ensure that access to the Internet, social media platforms, SMS and all other associated communication services is unrestricted throughout the electioneering period.

The call was contained in a letter signed by 16 press freedom groups of the #KeepItOn coalition across the globe and addressed to the Executive Vice Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Nigerian Communications Commission (NCC). The petitioners highlighted the need for the authorities to keep the Internet on as it is an enabler of other rights including freedom of expression and access to information.

Earlier this month on February 1, 2019, the government denied claims that it was planning to shut down the Internet during the country’s federal elections.

Nigeria’s presidential elections is scheduled for tomorrow, February 16, 2019.

You can access a copy of the letter submitted to the NCC here.

MISA Zimbabwe Highlights the Role of the Radio in Fostering Dialogue and Tolerance on World Radio Day

This statement was originally oublished on zimbabwe.misa.org on February 13, 2019.

MISA Zimbabwe joins the world in commemorating World Radio Day. This day is celebrated annually on the 13th of February and this year’s commemorations are being held under the theme: Dialogue, Tolerance and Peace.

This year’s theme acknowledges the role played by radio in facilitating dialogue and building tolerance through respectful sharing of divergent views, thus fostering peace within communities and nations.

The theme is indeed timeous for Zimbabwe as it coincides with the repeated calls for meaningful national dialogue to address the country’s deteriorating socio-economic and political environment in the wake of the disputed outcome of the 2018 presidential elections.

It is in that regard that radio can play a fundamental role in facilitating national dialogue in Zimbabwe. Radio serves as a convenient information-sharing platform that is more popular and easily accessible than television because of its wide reach.

Ideally, Zimbabweans can, for example, follow and share ideas as well as participate in radio programmes focusing on the envisaged national dialogue through the country’s various national radio stations.

However, in Zimbabwe, the reality on the ground is far from the ideal. Access to radio is mainly still concentrated in mostly urban and peri-urban communities. This means that communities in outlying, rural areas, especially those along Zimbabwe’s national borders, have to rely on radio broadcasts from Zimbabwe’s neighbouring countries.

These marginalised communities are thus effectively excluded from participating in national conversations that take place on national publicly owned radio stations such as Radio Zimbabwe, Classic FM, Power FM, and National FM.

This makes a strong case for the licensing of community radio stations as provided for in terms of the Broadcasting Services Act. The Act provides for the three-tier broadcasting system comprising, public, commercial, and community broadcasting in Zimbabwe.

Currently, the Broadcasting Authority of Zimbabwe has only licensed national and commercial radio stations. Community radio stations are still to be licensed and legally recognised in Zimbabwe, 18 years after enactment of the BSA in 2001.

By their nature, commercial and national radio stations usually offer generic one-size fits all content broadcast in Zimbabwe’s major languages. Such programming is at times not relevant to specific community needs and issues. This gap can easily be filled by community radio stations.

Other countries with robust community radio initiatives, define communities to include members that live together within a specific geographical area, as well as groups of people who share a common set of beliefs or interests even though residing in different geographical areas.

As Zimbabwe commemorates this day, MISA Zimbabwe reiterates its calls for the speedy licensing of local community radio stations. This will go a long way in giving marginalised communities their voice in national affairs that seek to promote dialogue and tolerance in Zimbabwe.

//END

High Court in Zimbabwe Annuls Internet Shutdown Directive by State Minister, Orders Restoration

This statetment was originally published on zimbabwe.misa.org on January 21, 2019.

High Court judge Justice Owen Tagu on 21 January 2019 ruled that the Minister of State in the President’s Office Responsible for National Security does not have the authority to issue any directives in terms of the Interception of Communications Act.

This means that the directives issued by Minister Owen Ncube to shut down the Internet in Zimbabwe are illegal and therefore, without effect.

The Interception of Communications Act is one of 12 Acts directly administered by the President of the Republic of Zimbabwe. The President does have the right to assign any other Cabinet members to act on his behalf to administer any of these 12 Acts.

This is in terms of Statutory Instrument 212 of 2018 as read with section 104(1) of the Constitution of Zimbabwe.

Advocate Eric Matinenga pointed this out as a preliminary point when he appeared on behalf of the Zimbabwe Lawyers for Human Rights and MISA Zimbabwe in their application challenging the use of the Interception of Communications Act (ICA).

Justice Tagu agreed with Advocate Matinenga’s submission that the Minister was not assigned with any authority to issue such directives by the President. He ruled that the directives issued in the minister’s name be set aside as they are unlawful.

The judge restricted his decision to the preliminary point raised by Advocate Matinenga. This means the court did not consider the other legal arguments contained in the joint court application.

The court did not consider whether the government has the right to completely shut down the Internet. And, if so, whether the Interception of Communications Act is the proper law to effect internet shutdowns or any other disruptions of communications.

The decision, therefore, means that mobile network operators and Internet service providers should restore full Internet access including access to social media applications and websites. Access to Applications such as WhatsApp and Facebook had been restricted since the morning of Tuesday 15 January 2019.

MISA Calls for Release of Journalist from Prolonged Detention

0

This statetment was originally published on zimbabwe.misa.org on January 22, 2019.

MISA Zimbabwe joins the international community in calling for the immediate release of Mozambican journalist Amade Abubacar who has been in detention since 5 January 2019.

Abubacar is a community radio journalist for the state-owned Rádio e Televisao Comunitária Nacedje de Macomia.

Military personnel picked Abubacar in Macomia, a town in Mozambique’s Cabo Delgado province on 5 January 2019. He is accused of colluding with militants that have sown terror in the northern Mozambican region. He remained in a military prison from the time of his arrest and was only transferred into police custody on 16 January 2019.

Abubacar appeared in court on 18 January 2019. The court denied him bail and further remanded him in custody. According to reports, the court ruled that his detention was lawful citing that he had appeared within 48 hours of his transfer to the police, completely ignoring his 11-day detention by the military.

Cabo Delgado is quickly turning into a media freedom violations hotspot. Abubacar’s arrest follows that of eNCA correspondent Pindai Dube in June 2018, and that of investigative journalist Estacio Valoi, Amnesty International researcher David Matsinhe, and their driver, Girafe Saide Tufane in December 2018.

This raises concerns that the military insurgencies are generally making Cabo Delgado an inhospitable province for journalists who might want to cover political events connected to the country’s national elections scheduled for this year.

MISA Zimbabwe Position

Abubacar’s prolonged detention by the military is a violation of his rights as well as his arrest under unconfirmed charges. The Mozambican government is setting a bad precedent in the violation of free expression and access to information in the region. The Southern African Development Community is strongly urged to act on the deteriorating media rights situation in Mozambique.

Ends

MISA Zimbabwe is a member of the Southern Africa Development Community Internet Governance Forum (SAIGF) Multi-Stakeholder Coordinating Team.

MISA Zimbabwe Regional Solidarity Statement

Internet Shutdowns, Fatal Clampdowns; a Continuing Threat to Freedom of Expression and Assembly Rights in Africa

By Felicia Anthonio, Coordinator of the African Freedom of Expression Exchange (AFEX)

In recent times, there has been an increase in the use of Internet shutdowns and excessive force by governments against protesters as a control measure of demonstrations across the African continent. The use of these repressive measures often result in the violation of fundamental rights of citizens such as freedom of expression, access to information, assembly and right to life.

Over the past one month, the governments of Sudan and Zimbabwe have failed to safeguard the fundamental rights of citizens with their respective responses to a series of protests in the two countries. There have been massive protests in Sudan and Zimbabwe over severe economic hardships. Governments in both countries have done little to attend to the demands of the citizenry, but rather responded with a heavy hand that has resulted in loss of lives.

The resort to repressive measures including Internet shutdowns, arrest and detention of opposition figures or activists and use of lethal force against protesters have led to deterioration in the already unenviable human rights situations of the two countries.

Security agents in Sudan in response to massive protests which broke out in various cities in the country in December 2018 fired live bullets and tear gas at protesters resulting in the killing of about 20 persons with several people injured. Several opposition figures have also been arbitrarily arrested for allegedly fuelling the protests. Aside these violations, the Al-Bashir led government ordered key telecom service providers in the country (MTN Sudan, Zain Sudan and Sudatel) to shut down access to social media platforms such as Twitter, Facebook, WhatsApp and Instagram on mobile networks to counter the anti-government protests.

Similarly, in January 2019, the government of Zimbabwe deployed lethal force and Internet blackout to control protests in Harare and other cities over hikes in fuel prices. The government cracked down on protesters with brutal force from security agents and an order for complete Internet shutdown in the country with about seven million of the country’s Internet population (2017 statistics) being digitally cut off from the rest of the world. Police brutalities against protesters resulted in the killing of about five persons. There have also been reported cases of other violations including arbitrary arrests, detention and physical assault of activists.

The repressive measures adopted by the two countries have proven futile as the protests continue to gather momentum despite these repressive measures being introduced.  

The situation in the two countries reflect a general pattern in Africa where the Internet is shut down and/or security forces launch fatal attacks on demonstrators, particularly anti-government protesters, with impunity.   The governments of Togo, Cameroon, Chad, Ethiopia and the Democratic Republic of Congo shut down the Internet amidst deadly crackdowns on anti-government protesters in 2017.  Click here to read AFEX’s Annual Report on the State of Internet Freedom in Africa for more information about countries that have experienced Internet shutdowns and violations in 2017.

Incidentally, the right to freedom of expression is enshrined in the constitutions of Sudan and Zimbabwe. Both of them are also signatories to regional and international frameworks such as the African Charter on Human and People’s Rights (ACHPR), the Universal Declaration on Human Rights (UDHR) and the International Covenant on Civic and Political Rights (ICCPR).

African Governments have a duty to ensure the fundamental rights of their citizenry are upheld at all times. It is, therefore, worrying if governments who themselves are supposed to safeguard the enjoyment of such freedoms, become the major violators of the rights of citizens.

African leaders should therefore adopt a more humane, rights-respecting approach to controlling public protests in line with their commitments under their countries’ constitutions and the many protocols and charters relating to freedom of expression and assembly that they have signed.

Killing of Ghanaian Journalist, Three Critical Safety of Journalists’ Issues to Consider

0

This statement was originally published on www.mfwa.org on January 21, 2019.

On Wednesday, January 16, 2019, Ahmed Hussein Suale, a member of the Tiger Eye PI investigative team led by Anas Aremeyaw Anas, was shot and killed by unknown gunmen.

The incident has attracted local, regional and international attention and condemnation. All actors including the UN have called on the Ghanaian authorities to promptly and thoroughly investigate the matter to bring the perpetrators to book.

While we are saddened by the death of Suale, the incident brings to bare three critical challenges on safety of journalists in Ghana that must be highlighted and given attention by all actors.

  1. State Failure

While individuals and institutions have a responsibility to protect journalists, the state has a primary responsibility in providing safety and protection for all, including journalists. But over the years, the Ghanaian state has woefully failed to live up to its duties as far as safety of journalists is concerned.

In the last four years for example, the Media Foundation for West Africa (MFWA) has reported 62 incidents of attacks on journalists and media houses in Ghana. This translates into more than one attack on journalists per month.

On many of these instances, the MFWA has often petitioned the appropriate authorities with due follow-ups or issued statements demanding action from authorities.

Recent examples of such abuses include the attacks on a reporter by a body guard of former President John Mahama; the attack on four reporters by security officers of the ruling New Patriotic Party at the party’s headquarters in Accra; soldiers’ assault on a freelance journalist, Kendrick Offei.

Others have included police brutality against Joy News reporter, Latif Idrissu and attack on GBC reporter, Yahyah Kwamoah by presidential staffer Stan Dogbe. There have also been attacks on media organisations such as Hot FM in Accra, Radio Justice in Tamale, and the Daily Guide’s offices in Kumasi.

Sadly, apart from actions taken by individual media organisations, notably the Multimedia Group, to secure justice for their abused staff, there is no evidence of state-led investigations leading to conclusions and justice for victims. Not even when an assault happened at their Headquarters have the police been able to unravel it.

For instance, one would have expected the state security agencies to have taken action against the Member of Parliament for Assin Central, Kennedy Agyapong, on his publicly made and widely publicised incitement of violence against the late Suale.

The consequence of the continued phenomenon of state inaction on issues of attacks on journalists have bred a thriving culture of impunity that can only create the impression that journalists can be abused without accountability.

  1. Inertia on the Part of the Media

The media themselves – media organisations, journalists and other workers – bear a great responsibility in raising the profile of safety of journalists issues and setting the agenda for authorities to consider them as priority national issues.

Unfortunately, over the years, reports on attacks on journalists rarely make top-level headlines in media coverage and discussions. At best, such reports are often taken up by the media organisation of the victims and very few others, and even in that case, the issue is not discussed on a sustained basis.

Quite often too, journalists who are victims of attacks and their respective media organisations fail to report the incidents to the police for investigations, and when they do, they often do not follow up. Indeed, in conversations between MFWA and the Ghana police on matters of safety of journalists, the police have often raised the issue of cases not being reported to them as one of their challenges.

  1. Undignified Compromises

There have been a number of occasions when the pursuit of justice in cases of violence against journalists have been compromised through backdoor settlement.

Such settlements, which sometimes include compensations, are done on the blind side of media actors seeking justice and through whose action the matter became high-profile.

In some instances too, such backdoor negotiations and compensations on abuses that are criminal in nature, are actually facilitated by media actors to the detriment of the pursuit of justice.

The spate of impunity over attacks on journalists and media houses across the country is extremely worrying.

It is unquestionable that journalists themselves and their respective media organisations have a role to play when it comes to their safety. However, the state has the ultimate responsibility to ensure the safety and security of all, including journalists.

While we still commiserate with the family of the late Ahmed Suale and demand prompt and thorough investigations into the incident, the MFWA calls on the government to demonstrate greater commitment to matters relating to the safety of journalists.

We also call on management of media organisations to take appropriate steps to guarantee the security and safety of their staff and where violations occur, to take necessary actions to seek justice.