Sunday, November 9, 2025
Home Blog Page 3

Persistent harassment of Lanre Arogundade by state security constitutes systematic abuse of power and violation of his rights

Vivian
-
0
Persistent harassment of Lanre Arogundade by state security constitutes systematic abuse of power and violation of his rights

For immediate release, Tuesday, April 16, 2024

The International Press Centre (IPC), hereby strongly registers its displeasure over yet another incident of harassment of its Executive Director, Mr. Lanre Arogundade, by officials of the State Security Service otherwise known as the DSS, at the Murtala Mohammed International Airport, Lagos, Nigeria.

The incident of Thursday April 11, while Mr. Arogundade prepared to board a late-night Air France Flight to Berlin, Germany to participate in the respective general meetings and conferences of the African Freedom of Expression Exchange (AFEX) and the International Freedom of Expression Exchange (IFEX) would be the umpteenth of such unwelcome development.

Mr. Arogundade is a renowned journalist, advocate for social justice and democracy, former Chairman of the Lagos State Council of Nigeria Union of Journalists and former President of the National Association of Nigerian Students. We believe these roles and positions should not warrant his unending torment by the DSS.

Mr. Arogundade recounted the encounter in a Facebook post: “I was harassed by DSS officials for about 40 minutes because they claimed my name was still flashing on their watchlist despite the declaration two years ago by the Director General of the State Security Service, Mr. Yusuf Magaji Bichi, that my name had been removed when he met a delegation of the Nigerian chapter of the International Press Institute (IPI) led by Musikilu Mojeed.”

Mr. Arogundade additionally informed IPC management that the senior DSS official to whom he was referred threatened to bar him from traveling unless he produced his old passports describing the request as “bizarre and ridiculous”.

IPC holds that the persistent harassment violates Mr. Arogundade’s right to freedom of movement while undermining basic democratic principles.

IPC hereby calls on the Director General of the DSS, and in particular his men and officers at the Murtala Mohammed International Airport to desist from further harassing Mr. Arogundade.

SGD:
Melody Akinjiyan
Press Freedom Officer, IPC
[email protected]

AFEX condemns the detention of journalist

Vivian
-
0
AFEX condemns the detention of journalist

On April 1, 2024, freelance journalist Mohamud Abdirashid Abdi was detained in the Luuq District of Gedo region in Somalia, which shares a border with Ethiopia.

According to a report by the Somali Journalists Syndicate, Mohamud was arrested after he made a social media post alleging an injury of two male rickshaw (popularly known as tuk tuk) drivers who had been shot by police over unpaid ‘fees’ demanded by police.

However, other reports indicate that his arrest was ordered by Luuq District Commissioner, Dahir Muhumad Nur, over claims that Mohamud had covertly recorded photos and videos concerning the movement of Ethiopian forces near the border.

Prior to his arrest, Mohamud received threatening messages after he made a post on Facebook. This led him to delete the post.

Mohamud’s family has been denied access to see him since his arrest.  He has also been reportedly beaten in the cell where he is presently held.

The continuous freedom of expression violations experienced by journalists potentially in Somalia places them in a high-risk job category, leading to young professionals avoiding the profession.

The African Freedom of Expression Exchange (AFEX) condemns the abuse of human rights in the case of journalist Mohamud Abdirashid Abdi. We urge Somalian authorities to release Mohamud and hold to account the military officers and other individuals responsible for this inexcusable abuse of power.

AFEX condemns Sudan’s hunt on journalism 

Vivian
-
0
AFEX condemns Sudan’s hunt on journalism 

On April 2, 2024, Sudan’s Acting Information Minister Graham Abdel-Qadir issued a directive suspending the operations of Al Arabiya News channel, Al Hadath TV, and Sky News Arabia, citing unprofessionalism and transparency, and a failure to renew their licences.

According to media reports, in the last week of March, Sky News Arabia channel aired a video report alleging the involvement of Islamic State insurgents providing support to the Sudanese army. This was refuted by the government calling the report “unprofessional.”

Although state authorities have indicated that the media outlets have failed to renew their licences, Al Arabiya’s Sudan bureau chief has refuted the claim by asserting that licences for Al Arabiya News channel and Al Hadath TV have been renewed periodically.

This is a clear violation of freedom of expression and freedom of the press amid a raging war where information is critical to the public interest. The level of atrocities committed against journalists, especially female journalists cannot be accounted for by virtue of compromised reporting.

The ongoing war in Sudan between the Rapid Support Forces (RSF) and the Sudan army has displaced 8 million people and killed more than 13,000 people according to the UN, and has created the world’s biggest displacement crisis.

State authorities in Sudan must recognise and stand in solidarity with journalists and media broadcasters who are risking their lives to provide information for the country and outside the country.

The African Freedom of Expression Exchange (AFEX) urges the relevant state authorities in Sudan support the work of journalists and other media organisations present in the country, and most importantly ensure that they have adequate protection as they report on the ongoing war in the country.

We firmly believe that journalism is critical to restoring peace to Sudan.

Rebuilding trust in the electoral process: IPC hosts multi-stakeholders dialogue

Vivian
-
0
Rebuilding trust in the electoral process: IPC hosts multi-stakeholders dialogue

Lagos, Nigeria – March 22, 2024.

The International Press Centre (IPC), based in Lagos, Nigeria, lead implementing partner of Component 4 (Support to Media) under the European Union Support to Democratic Governance in Nigeria Phase 2 (EUSDGN II) project, announces its upcoming major forum. Scheduled for Monday, March 25, 2024, this event will convene about 100 electoral stakeholders to address the critical theme of “Rebuilding Trust in the Electoral Processes, Institutions and Elections.”

Following the success of the inaugural session held in Abuja, this subsequent edition of the media and civil society-driven forum aims to further stimulate meaningful discussions on how to reinforce commitments and approaches to multi-stakeholder collaboration for enhancing confidence in electoral processes. The initiative is also being embarked upon ahead of the off-cycle governorship elections in Edo and Ondo States later this year and preparatory activities towards the 2027 general elections.

The forum seeks to gather submissions and recommendations on how diverse stakeholders, including the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC), the Media, Civil Society Organizations (CSOs), Law Enforcement Agencies, Political Party Leaders, Youth, Women, and the Public, can effectively fulfill their roles and collaborate to enhance the integrity of the electoral process in Nigeria.

Prof. Isaac Albert of the University of Ibadan will present the lead paper at the event, which will be chaired by Prof. Okey Ibeanu, a former INEC National Commissioner. The event will receive special remarks from the INEC Chairman, Prof. Mahmood Yakubu and EU Ambassador Samuela Isopi, among others. The event shall also be moderated by renowned broadcaster, Mr. Ambrose Somide of Raypower FM.

Mr. Lanre Arogundade, the Executive Director of IPC, in a statement emphasised the importance of transparent elections in bolstering citizens’ trust in the electoral system, particularly in developing democracies like Nigeria. He highlighted the correlation between encountering obstacles during elections and reduced confidence in elected officials, often leading to participation in activities opposing the ruling regime.

In anticipation of the forthcoming collaboration with key election stakeholders, especially the media, Mr. Arogundade reiterated the commitment to engaging in proposals and contributions aimed at enhancing public trust in Nigeria’s electoral system. This collaboration seeks to foster constructive discussions, address challenges, and work towards improving the overall integrity and transparency of elections in Nigeria.

Participation in the dialogue is also expected from various sectors, including the leadership of INEC, Political Parties represented by the Inter-Party Advisory Council (IPAC), key institutions such as the National Orientation Agency and Security Agencies, as well as representatives from traditional and religious bodies, CSOs, the European Union (EU) Delegation, EUSDGN Partners, Labour Unions, and Community Leaders.

This initiative is supported by the European Union.

For media inquiries or further information, please contact:

Olutoyin Ayoade

Communications Officer, IPC

[email protected]

#IWD2024: Inspiring women’s inclusion in Africa

Vivian
-
0
#IWD2024: Inspiring women’s inclusion in Africa

Today, the world celebrates International Women’s Day 2024 under the theme of #InspireInclusion, which encourages the realisation of a gender-equal world free of bias, stereotypes and discrimination. However, amidst the global celebration, it is crucial to spotlight the persistent challenges faced by African female journalists, both online and offline.

A 2020 global survey conducted by UNESCO confirmed a disturbing trend: online attacks targeting women journalists are on the rise at an alarming rate. These attacks are part of a deliberate strategy to intimidate, degrade, and silence women in the media industry. Such violence aims to instill fear, undermine professionalism, discredit journalistic integrity, erode trust in factual reporting, and ultimately stifle women’s active participation in public discourse especially as these attacks don’t just affect the targeted journalists – they also impact their sources and audiences, encourage self-censorship leading to a chilling effect on freedom of expression and access to information.

Research shows that the tactics used to attack women journalists is dominated by online trolling which often takes the form of gendered and sexualised attacks and, often involves body shaming. Trolling which has evolved into the practice of coordinated cyber armies that run campaigns – sometimes sponsored by some government officials and other powerful political actors.

It should be noted that online violence also shifts into offline spaces – with potentially deadly consequences. However, despite this, there remains a disturbing trend, particularly for African women journalists who experience online abuse – they often hesitate to seek justice and, when they do, encounter challenges in having their complaints taken seriously and thoroughly investigated.

Notably, the low levels of digital security skills and the inadequacy of existing laws in tackling trolling and Technology-Facilitated Gender-Based Violence (TFGBV), only exacerbate the challenges African women journalists face in the profession.

African female journalists are instrumental in conveying key narratives, shedding light on issues of importance, and amplifying marginalised voices and concerns. However, the increased affronts to their profession and presence in online discourse encourage self-censorship and unmeasurable impact on access to information and freedom of expression of this key segment of society.

In the first Africa Media Freedom and Journalists’ Safety Report released in 2022, the Collaboration on International ICT Policy for East and Southern Africa (CIPESA) in partnership with the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) reiterated the growing presence of Technology-Facilitated Gender-Based Violence (TFGBV) as a deterrent to press freedom, especially for women.

It is against this backdrop that CIPESA has consistently pursued various interventions aimed at enhancing the safety and inclusion of women in online spaces. Some of the initiatives have been specific to addressing the needs of African women journalists, such as a Media Masterclass and Reporting Grant, research into online safe spaces for women, both of which were conducted under the WomenAtWeb project of Deutsche Welle (DW). Further, CIPESA gave grants aimed at enhancing gendered digital inclusion and women journalists’ safety under the Africa Digital Rights Fund to beneficiaries in Somalia, Malawi and Tanzania, as well as in Ghana and Nigeria.

This year, in partnership with the International Programme for the Development of Communication (IPDC) of UNESCO, CIPESA is supporting media development efforts to promote a safe, independent, and pluralistic press, including through addressing the gender dynamics of media freedom and journalists’ safety in Africa.

In recognition of Women’s Month, a series of workshops will be hosted alongside Digital Security Cafes for women journalists, media practitioners, and content producers in Ethiopia, Tanzania, and Uganda.

The workshops will include discussions based on the findings of Africa Media Freedom and Journalists’ Safety Report with a focus on elevating awareness of what can be done to pursue more inclusive measures for women journalists.

Further women’s month efforts will be a webinar on African women in politics with the aim of highlighting the importance of increased political inclusion of women in politics.  The role of active online engagement will be highlighted as a key driver enabling the needs of women in politics in various African countries and as a tool to participate in the information society meaningfully.  More importantly, the webinar will cast a spotlight on how women in active politics in various African countries are pushing back against the negative narratives online and the role that actors such as policy makers  and platforms have to play in addressing TFGBV associated with political spaces and discourse.

Register to participate in the webinar here.

How AFIC is Building Transparency and Accountability Across Africa Society

Vivian
-
0
How AFIC is Building Transparency and Accountability Across Africa Society

Transparency and accountability are fundamental pillars of good governance. Transparency ensures that government processes, decisions, and data are open and accessible to the public, fostering trust and informed participation in the democratic process.

Conversely, accountability guarantees that public officials are answerable for their actions, with mechanisms in place for oversight and redress when necessary.

The Africa Freedom of Information Centre (AFIC) emerges as a crucial player in upholding these principles across the African continent. As a pan-African network, AFIC champions the right to information, advocating for policies and practices that strengthen both transparency and accountability.

Through their dedicated efforts, AFIC empowers citizens and civil society organizations to actively engage in governance, demand fair practices, and hold leaders accountable.

This, in turn, has fostered a robust democratic environment and paved the way for sustainable development across Africa

AFIC’s Mission and Vision

The Africa Freedom of Information Centre (AFIC) is unwavering in its commitment to fostering transparency and accountability across the African continent. These principles are not simply values, but the very foundation of AFIC’ s mission: empowering every African citizen with the right to access information freely.

AFIC believes that this access is the catalyst for informed participation in governance, leading to the establishment of more transparent and accountable institutions.

Transparency is the cornerstone of AFIC’s work. We firmly believe that open access to information held by governments empowers citizens to understand, engage with, and challenge the way their societies are governed.

This open environment is vital to a healthy democracy, as it helps to prevent corruption, facilitate public participation, and foster trust in public institutions.

Equally crucial to AFIC is the principle of accountability, ensuring that those entrusted with public service are held answerable for their actions.

By advocating for laws and practices that facilitate scrutiny and oversight, AFIC empowers citizens and civil society organizations to hold governments accountable for their decisions and the use of public resources.

Together, these values form the backbone of AFIC’s vision: an Africa where the free flow of information is the norm, not the exception. A continent where transparency and accountability are not just abstract concepts, but lived realities that empower citizens, reduce inequality, and drive sustainable development.

AFIC envisions a future where every individual has the information they need to make informed choices about their lives and hold those in power accountable, ensuring that leaders serve the public interest with integrity and fairness.

AFIC’s Strategies for Promoting Transparency

The Africa Freedom of Information Centre (AFIC) employs a multifaceted approach to enhance transparency across the African continent, emphasizing education and collaborative partnerships.

This approach recognizes the crucial role of both informed citizens and collaborative engagement in fostering a culture of transparency and accountability.

Educational Initiatives and Public Awareness Campaigns

  • AFIC designs and implements targeted educational programs for the general public and specific stakeholders, including government officials and journalists. These programs aim to raise awareness about the right to information (RTI) and its significance in strengthening democratic governance.
  • AFIC spearheads public awareness campaigns to inform citizens about their RTI rights and the available mechanisms for accessing information. These campaigns often involve strategic partnerships with media outlets, targeted community outreach programs, and the dissemination of informative materials in various formats.

Partnerships with Governments and Other Organizations

  • AFIC collaborates with government bodies to advocate for the adoption and implementation of open information policies. This collaboration includes providing technical assistance for the development of legal frameworks that promote transparency and facilitate easy access to information for citizens.
  • Recognizing the power of collective action, AFIC fosters partnerships with other civil society organizations (CSOs) both within Africa and internationally. This network of stakeholders allows for the exchange of best practices, resources, and strategies for promoting transparency across the continent.
  • By sharing knowledge and expertise, AFIC aims to create a unified front advocating for transparent and accountable governance in Africa.

Through this comprehensive approach, AFIC aims to create an environment where transparency is not just expected but actively demanded by an informed and empowered citizenry. This, in turn, will lead to more accountable and responsive governance throughout Africa, fostering a more just and equitable society for all.

Accountability Efforts by AFIC

Monitoring and evaluation of public contracts and service delivery

Engaging officials and stakeholders in discussions on performance and value for money

AFIC’s accountability initiatives are crucial in ensuring that public resources are used efficiently and effectively, reflecting the organization’s dedication to fostering responsible governance.

Monitoring and Evaluation of Public Contracts and Service Delivery

AFIC actively monitors public contracts to ensure they are awarded transparently and executed according to plan. This oversight helps prevent corruption and mismanagement of public funds.

The organization further evaluates service delivery outcomes to ensure public services meet the needs of the community and that funds are used appropriately.

Engaging Officials and Stakeholders

AFIC facilitates open dialogue between government officials and stakeholders to discuss the performance and value for money of public projects. These discussions promote accountability by encouraging officials to act in the public’s best interest and deliver results that justify public expenditures.

By cultivating a culture of accountability, AFIC contributes to a more responsible administrative environment where public trust is fostered, and ultimately, better governance is achieved.

Through these efforts, AFIC contributes to a more accountable administrative environment where public funds are managed with integrity and transparency, ultimately leading to better governance and public trust.

Challenges to Transparency and Accountability in Africa

Despite significant strides, promoting transparency and accountability in Africa remains an ongoing struggle. Several challenges continue to hinder progress, demanding innovative solutions and unwavering commitment.

Common Obstacles

  • Corruption: A persistent and pervasive issue across many African nations, corruption acts as a formidable barrier to transparency and accountability. It diverts resources away from vital public services and erodes public trust in institutions.
  • Fraud: Instances of fraud, particularly in public procurement and service delivery, create an environment of opacity and hinder accountability. Often undetected due to weak oversight mechanisms, these fraudulent practices undermine public trust and impede development efforts.
  • Lack of Disclosure: One of the fundamental pillars of transparency is the timely and complete disclosure of information by governments. However, many African countries continue to struggle with this aspect, hindering citizens’ ability to be fully informed about governance processes and hold their leaders accountable.

AFIC’ s Approach to Overcoming these Challenges

To combat these issues, AFIC employs a proactive approach that includes:

  • Advocacy for Stronger Laws: AFIC champions the development and implementation of robust legal frameworks that mandate transparency and accountability. This includes advocating for clear obligations on information disclosure and establishing mechanisms for public oversight.
  • Capacity Building: AFIC invests in capacity building initiatives. They train both government officials and civil society actors on implementing and upholding transparency and accountability standards. This equips individuals with the knowledge and skills necessary to effectively navigate these crucial principles within their respective roles.
  • Public Engagement: AFIC understands the power of an informed and engaged citizenry. They actively promote public participation in governance. This involves raising awareness about citizens’ rights, equipping them with the tools and knowledge to demand accountability, and fostering a culture where holding leaders responsible is seen as a civic duty.
  • Monitoring and Reporting: AFIC maintains a vigilant eye on government actions through diligent monitoring. They track activities, identify potential discrepancies, and bring instances of corruption or fraud to light through public reporting.

Through these combined efforts, AFIC aims to create a more transparent and accountable governance landscape across Africa, where citizens are empowered to hold their leaders to account and contribute to the development of their societies.

Case Studies and Success Stories

AFIC has made a significant impact on improving transparency and accountability in various African countries. Here are some examples and testimonials that highlight their work:

AFIC’s Impact:

Since 2009, AFIC has worked with partners to raise the number of nations with Access to Information (ATI) legislation from five to 29.

Strategies include shadow reporting, bill analysis, technical support, mobilising OGP pledges, petitions, letter campaigns, promotional missions, and collaboration with the Special Rapporteur on Freedom of Expression and Access to Information in Africa.

AFIC has observer status with the Africa Commission on Human and People’s Rights. Over 2,500,000 officials, civil society representatives, and media in Malawi, Kenya, Ghana, Nigeria, and Uganda received training manuals.

Testimonials from Beneficiaries:

Citizens and members of civil society have expressed how AFIC’s work has empowered them. For instance, through AFIC’s advocacy, citizens have embraced their right to access information, using it to question government decisions and monitor projects in sectors like health, water, sanitation, and education.

These case studies and testimonials underscore AFIC’s role in fostering a culture of transparency and accountability, which is essential for the democratic and socio-economic development of African nations.

If you’re interested in more detailed case studies or specific testimonials, AFIC’s website offers a wealth of information and resources.

The Future of Transparency and Accountability with AFIC

AFIC’s ongoing projects and future initiatives are geared towards strengthening the principles of transparency and accountability across Africa. Here’s an overview of their vision and the steps they are taking to achieve it:

Ongoing Projects and Future Initiatives

AFIC is continuously working on projects that promote the right of access to information, such as the Open Contracting for Health Project (OC4H) and the COVID-19 Transparency and Accountability Project (CTAP).

The organization has endorsed a new 5-year strategic plan for 2021-2025, focusing on access to information as a bridge to sustainable development. This plan includes advocating for the ratification and domestication of African Union treaties that recognize the right to information and campaigning for the adoption of access to information laws in at least 25 African countries.

Vision for the Evolution of Transparency and Accountability

AFIC envisions a future where all African citizens can exercise their right to access information, which is fundamental for promoting democratic rule and ensuring government transparency and accountability.

The organization aims to see these principles become a reality through the implementation of their strategic plan, which seeks to boost the capacity of AFIC members and use regional and international mechanisms to advance the right to information.

Special attention is given to vulnerable and disadvantaged groups, ensuring that no one is left behind in the quest for transparency and accountability.

AFIC’s commitment to these principles is unwavering, and their efforts are crucial in shaping a future where transparency and accountability are not just ideals but the very pillars of governance in Africa.

Conclusion

The pursuit of transparency and accountability is not merely a matter of policy preference; it is essential for the flourishing of African democracies and economies. These principles form the bedrock of good governance, ensuring that power is wielded responsibly and for the collective benefit of all citizens.

The Africa Freedom of Information Centre (AFIC) has served as a trailblazer in this pursuit, empowering both citizens and civil society with the instruments and knowledge necessary to demand openness and integrity from their leaders.

The significance of AFIC’s mission cannot be overstated. By promoting transparency and accountability, AFIC contributes to combating corruption, enhancing public service delivery, and fortifying democratic institutions.

This work lays the foundation for sustainable development, fostering an environment where resources are managed judiciously and development policies are formulated and implemented in the public interest.

As we look towards the future, it is evident that the path towards a truly transparent and accountable Africa demands collective action. This journey necessitates the engagement and support of all stakeholders, from grassroots-level advocates to international partners.

We urge readers to actively participate in this transformative movement by supporting AFIC’s mission, engaging in their initiatives, and raising awareness about the critical importance of access to information.

Through united efforts, we can realize the vision of an Africa characterized by informed citizens, responsive governments, and equitable development.

In solidarity with AFIC’s mission, let us all embrace the role of champions for transparency and accountability. It is through our collective endeavors that we can shape an Africa that truly embodies the principles of “of the people, by the people, and for the people.”

Director of TV station stabbed

Vivian
-
0
Director of TV station stabbed

The Media Foundation for West Africa (MFWA) strongly condemns the brazen assault on Maïmouna Ndour Faye, director of the television station 7TV, and urges the government to expedite investigations leading to the arrest of the perpetrator.

On February 29, 2024, Senegal was shocked by a violent attack on Maïmouna Ndour Faye, owner of the Dakar-based 7TV outside her home. The assailant, who remains unidentified, ambushed her, stabbing her multiple times and dragging her on several metres before leaving her unconscious and covered in blood.

The gruesome incident occurred in the evening, shortly after Maïmouna Ndour Faye’s regular programme with Farba Ngom, a Member of Parliament and head of propaganda for the ruling party, the Alliance pour la République (APR).

Fortunately, initial medical assessments indicated that Maïmouna Ndour Faye’s injuries are not life-threatening, and she is responding to treatment. Ibrahima Lissa Faye, head of the press union Coordination des Associations de Presse (CAP), and 7TV news presenter Mamadou Awa Ndiaye confirmed her condition.

The assault has sparked widespread condemnation from journalists, civil society members, and politicians, who have unanimously denounced it as “cowardly” and “despicable.”

President Macky Sall condemned the violence, emphasising that “Press freedom is a fundamental right that must be protected and respected in all circumstances. No form of violence can be tolerated, and those responsible for this attack will have to answer for their actions before the courts.”

In the same statement on the social media platform X, he reaffirmed his commitment to creating a safe environment for media professionals in the country.

“This country has been drifting towards a dangerous slope for some years now with a tendency to impose one-track thinking. Those of us who host political broadcasts are insulted and threatened all day long. Today, intellectuals and some politicians are avoiding public discourse,” lamented Mamadou Awa Ndiaye, a colleague of Mame Faye, who spoke to the MFWA via a messaging App.

Prominent journalist and social justice activist, Mame Diarra Diarra Ndiaye, expressed deep outrage over the brutal attack on Madame Maimouna Ndour Faye in Senegal at the beginning of Women’s History Month on March 1, 2024. As International Women’s Day approached, she called for solidarity and action against the culture of impunity and violence. Justice was demanded not only for Madame Ndour Faye but also for all victims of police violence, arbitrary arrests, and silenced voices.

Several other voices condemned what they termed a criminal act and expressed their solidarity with her.

Karim Wade declared that “the attack against Maimouna Ndour Faye is an attack against everyone”, underlining the importance of supporting the victim.

Candidate Amadou BA’s campaign management denounced this “violent attack” and called for the culprits to be sought out and punished, saying that this act was “unacceptable in a leading democracy.”

The Khalifa Président Coalition also strongly condemned the attack, denouncing “a level of intolerance that is rampant in our society” and expressing its solidarity with Maimouna Ndour Faye.

The Diomaye Président coalition wished the journalist well and also condemned the brutal attack.

The Minister of the Interior, Sidiki Kaba, visited the victim and called the act “despicable”, ordering the relevant services to seek out and apprehend the perpetrators.

The Minister for Communication, Moussa Bocar Thiam, strongly condemned the attack, describing it as “a despicable act and an attempted murder”, and gave assurances that the State would do everything in its power to identify the culprits.

Finally, human rights organisations also expressed their indignation and called for an investigation to bring the perpetrators to justice. These include organisations such as the Ligue Sénégalaise des Droits de l’Homme (LSDH), ARTICLE 19 Sénégal et Afrique de l’Ouest, Amnesty International Sénégal, the Rencontre Africaine pour la Défense des Droits de l’Homme (RADDHO), AfrikaJom Center and AfricTivistes.

The CAP labelled the attack as an “act of unacceptable barbarism” and expressed concerns about recurring attacks, particularly against women journalists. It pledged to support Maimouna Ndour Faye in her legal efforts to ensure that the culprits are apprehended and punished.

The MFWA is appalled by the brutal attempted murder of Maïmouna Ndour Faye, and reiterates its call for swift investigations leading to the arrest of the culprits. While urging the Senegalese state to be more diligent for the safety of Maimouna and all other journalists, we urge all journalists to be more cautious in the field.

IPC condemns threats against journalist

Vivian
-
0
IPC condemns threats against journalist

The Centre for Safety and Protection of Journalists (I-CSPJ), International Press Center has expressed concerns about the alleged reported threats on the life of the Editor-in-Chief of Fresh Angle International Newspaper, Ebule Anthony Metsese.

Information reaching the I-CSPJ, states that Ebule Metsese has raised an alarm over alleged recurring threats to his life as a result of the controversial developments in Warri Kingdom.

Ebule stated that the most recent of such threats was connected to the incident that happened at Okere Community in Warri, on Saturday, March 2, 2024.

In a report filed, Ebule stated that, “As an indigene of Okere Community and a seasoned Mass Communicator, who understands and practice the concept of Social Responsibility Theory of the Media, I decided not to publish the event that happened in my beloved Okere Community on that fateful day. Shockingly, despite our (Me and other members of Fresh Angle International Editorial Team) decision to play down on what transpired at Okere, there have been series of warnings, directly or indirectly targeted at me (Ebule Anthony Metsese) insisting that if I publish any report regarding the incident, I will be severely dealt with.”

He further stated, the threats are not unconnected with the patronage Fresh Angle International Newspaper gets from some persons. “Interestingly some persons in the quarters where the threats are coming from, occasionally patronize Fresh Angle International through proxies, whilst making remarks that impugn on the professional integrity of Fresh Angle International Newspaper in their private and social gatherings.

A few others from the threat axis, have never bothered to patronize Fresh Angle International Newspaper, whenever they have need to do any form of publicity, rather they enjoy blackmail against Fresh Angle International and are on the trajectory of intimidating members of our Editorial Team, particular me, the Editor-In-Chief. I consider this a deliberate strategy to censor reports from this fast-growing Newspaper, enjoying increasing global appeal,” the report stated.

I-CSPJ is deeply worried about the situation of Journalist Ebule Anthony Metsese and hereby calls on the Nigerian government and the security agencies to ensure that he is not harmed in any way.

I-CSPJ enjoins anyone who may be aggrieved over the reports by the organisation or its Editor-in -Chief to seek redress through legal channels instead of attempting to resort to extra-judicial self-help.

I-CSPJ believes the time has come to stop attacks on journalists in Nigeria so that the country would stop being counted among dangerous zones for journalists to practice.

SGD:

Melody Akinjiyan
Press Freedom Officer, IPC
melodyakinjiyan[@]ipcng.org
Melody Akinjiyan is Programme Officer at International Press Centre

Court in Nigeria nullifies provisions of broadcasting code

Vivian
-
0
Court in Nigeria nullifies provisions of broadcasting code

Lagos, Wednesday, January 17, 2024: A Federal High Court in Abuja today declared null and void the provisions of the Nigeria Broadcasting Code authorizing the National Broadcasting Commission (NBC) to impose fines on broadcast stations for alleged breaches of the Code as it ruled that administrative and regulatory bodies could not exercise judicial powers.

Delivering judgment in a suit instituted by Media Rights Agenda (MRA) against the NBC following the Commission’s imposition of fines of N5 million each on a television station and three pay TV platforms in 2022 for allegedly undermining Nigeria’s national security by broadcasting documentaries on banditry in Nigeria, Justice Rita Ofili-Ajumogobia held that the NBC not a court of law, acted above its powers by imposing such fines.

The judge commended MRA for its legal challenge of the NBC’s action and issued an order of perpetual injunction restraining the Commission or anyone acting on its behalf from further imposing any fine on any media platform or broadcast station in Nigeria for any alleged offence committed under the Nigeria Broadcasting Code.

Justice Ofili-Ajumogobia set aside the fines imposed by the NBC on August 3, 2022 on Multichoice Nigeria Limited, owners of DSTV; TelCom Satellite Limited (TSTV); Trust-TV Network Limited; and NTA Startimes Limited for broadcasting a documentary about the state of banditry and security in Zamfara State, saying the regulator’s action was wrong and unjustifiable in a democratic society.

Abuja-based human rights lawyer, Mr. Uche Amulu, filed the suit on behalf of MRA asking the court to hold, among other things, the NBC’s action of imposing a fine on each of the media platforms and the station for broadcasting a documentary about the state of banditry and security in Zamfara State is unlawful and unconstitutional and has a chilling effect on the freedom of media to impart information and ideas. MRA contended that it would deter the platforms and station from reporting the true state of affairs regarding the security situation in Nigeria, and therefore constitutes a violation of the rights of MRA, its members, and other citizens of Nigeria to freedom of expression, particularly their rights to receive ideas and information without interference, as guaranteed by the Constitution and the African Charter on Human and People’s Rights.

MRA also sought a declaration that the procedure adopted by the NBC in imposing the fines is a flagrant violation of the rules of natural justice and the right to fair hearing under Section 36 of the Constitution and Article 7 of the African Charter as the Commission is the drafter of the Code, which provides for the alleged offences for which the media platforms and the station were punished, and which empowers the NBC to receive complaints, investigate and adjudicate on the complaints, impose fines and collect fines.

MRA contended that the NBC, not being a court of law and not having been constituted in manner as to secure its independence and impartiality, has no power or competence to impose

page1image55429184

fines on broadcast stations as punishment or penalties for the commission of an offence as the competence to establish that an offence has been committed and to impose criminal sanctions or penalties belongs to the courts.

Besides, it claimed, the NBC, not being the Nigerian Police or a law enforcement agency, has no power to conduct a criminal investigation or an investigation that could lead to criminal charges against the affected media platforms and stations or the imposition of criminal penalties and accordingly, that the investigation purportedly conducted by the Commission, leading to the fines imposed on the media platforms and station for alleged offences under the Nigeria Broadcasting Code is ultra vires, null and void.

MRA also urged the Court to declare that the Nigeria Broadcasting Code issued by the NBC, being a subsidiary legislation that empowers it as a regulatory and administrative body to enforce the provisions of the Code, cannot confer judicial powers or jurisdiction in criminal matters on the Commission to impose criminal sanctions or penalties such as fines, particularly as the Code was made by the NBC itself.

It urged the Court to declare the fines unconstitutional, ultra vires, null and void, set them aside and issue an order of perpetual injunction restraining the NBC, its servants, agents, privies, representatives or anyone acting for or on its behalf, from further imposing any fine on any of the media platforms or station, or any other broadcast station in Nigeria for any alleged offence committed under the Nigeria Broadcasting Code.

In her judgment, Justice Ofili-Ajumogobia agreed with all MRA’s arguments and granted all the declarations and injunction sought by the organization. She however refused to grant the organization’s claim for N700,000 as costs it incurred in litigating the action; another claim for N2 million as general damages for NBC’s infringement on its rights as well as a request for N1 million as punitive damages for the Commission’s “outrageous conduct in abusing its powers and arbitrarily imposing fines on broadcasting stations”.

For further information, please contact:

Idowu Adewale Communications Manager [email protected]

MFWA collaborates with IPI to produce legal resource on Senegal

Vivian
-
0
MFWA collaborates with IPI to produce legal resource on Senegal

The Media Foundation for West Africa (MFWA) has partnered with the International Press Institute (IPI) to produce a resource tool kit on the legal and regulatory frameworks governing the media in Senegal.

Senegalese digital rights group Jonction also contributed to the production of the tool kit which provides a comprehensive overview of the domestic, regional, and international frameworks protecting press freedom and access to information in Senegal.

While highlighting the legal foundations for press freedom in Senegal, the document also flags laws that undermine these fundamental rights, with a spotlight on recent press freedom violations in the country. These include the arrest and detention of several journalists on charges of publishing false information, discrediting the institutions of state, undermining national security or public order.

Senegal has always been widely admired for its robust democracy and respect for press freedom. However, the recent wave of repression of divergent voices has raised a lot of concern, especially as the country gears up for crucial elections in February 2024.

The tool kit is therefore expected to be a useful reference material for journalists, media defense organisations, media training institutions and other actors with a stake in peaceful and effective media coverage of the upcoming polls.

To that end, the document provides information on local organisations promoting media development and supporting press freedom in Senegal. Access the tool kit here.

Five years on: MFWA calls for an end to impunity over Ahmed Suale’s murder

Vivian
-
0
Five years on: MFWA calls for an end to impunity over Ahmed Suale’s murder

Ahmed Suale, a member of the Tiger Eye PI investigative that produced the expose on corruption in African football, was gunned down by unknown assailants in Accra on January 16, 2019.

On the fifth anniversary of the journalist’s passing, the Media Foundation for West Africa (MFWA) retraces the events leading to, and since that single most appalling attack on press freedom in Ghana:

  1. May 2018 – A leading member of the ruling New Patriotic Party (NPP) and MP, Kennedy Agyapong threatens to “expose” investigative journalist Anas Aremeyaw Anas, if he goes ahead to screen the advertised investigative documentary on corruption in African football.
  2. June 6, 2018 – “Number 12”, the investigative documentary is publicly screened in Accra.
  3. The MP begins carrying out his threat, publishing photographs of members of the team including Anas and Suale who are always disguised.
  4. Agyapong escalates his campaign of hate against Ahmed Suale in particular, calling on his supporters to attack the journalist.
  5. January 16, 2019 – Unidentified gunmen waylay Ahmed Suale’s vehicle in traffic, shooting him
  6. January 21, 2019 – Police announce they have interrogated Ken Agyapong and former Ghana Football Association President, Kwesi Nyantakyi, in connection with the murder.
  7. January 22, 2019, a week after the murder, a high-powered police delegation visits the crime scene. They commiserate with Ahmed Suale’s family and assure them of apprehending and prosecuting the perpetrators.
  8. January 30, 2019 – Kennedy Agyapong says publicly that he does not regret blowing the cover of Ahmed Suale.
  9. February 7, 2019 – Police arrest six suspects over the murder. By March, all suspects are released for lack of evidence.
  10. March 18, 2019 – Ken Agyappong reveals that his campaign of attacks on the Tiger Eye team was instigated by leading members of the ruling NPP who felt Anas’ work was dangerous to the NPP.
  11. July 2019 – Ghana’s Attorney General announces she is yet to receive a docket on the Ahmed Suale case from the Police.
  12. September 9, 2019 – President Akufo-Addo says the assassination of Suale may not be necessarily connected to his job as a journalist and therefore not necessarily an attack on press freedom. The MFWA protests the President’s statement, describing it as unfortunate.
  13. May 24, 2021 – Ken Agyapong names one Ansu Gyeabour as the killer of Suale. Ansu Gyeabour refutes Ken Agyapong’s allegation.
  14. December 13, 2022 – At a forum to commemorate World Human Rights Day, Ghana’s Attorney General, Godfred Yeboah Dame, insinuates that the murder of Suale may be unconnected to his job as a journalist. The MFWA responds with an article.
  15. December 22, 2022 – President Akufo-Addo vows that his government will continue to search for the murderers of Suale.
  16. May 15, 2023 – Former President John Mahama and presidential candidate for the opposition National Democratic Congress (NDC), pledges to pursue the case of Ahmed Hussein Suale if he is voted president in 2024.
  17. January 16, 2024 –The impunity, pain and judicial lethargy continues.

Every minute of impunity over Ahmed Suale’s killing is a gain to his killers and an incentive for future perpetrators of attacks on journalists, human rights defenders or whistleblowers. We must not let it continue any minute longer.

The MFWA urges all actors in the media sector to remain steadfast in the demand for an end to impunity over Ahmed Suale’s murder. Despair is not an option.

Funding allocation for Nigeria’s FOI Act in 2024 budget signals lack of commitment -MRA

Vivian
-
0
Funding allocation for Nigeria’s FOI Act in 2024 budget signals lack of commitment -MRA

Lagos, Friday, December 29, 2023:  Media Rights Agenda (MRA) today expressed deep concern over the poor level of funding in the Federal Government’s 2024 budget for the implementation of the Freedom of Information (FOI) Act and FOI-related activities by public institutions, saying the situation signals the Government’s lack of commitment to make the Law effective.

In a press statement announcing the release of its 18-page report titled “A Vote Against Transparency: A Report on Allocations for Freedom of Information Implementation in 2024 Federal Budget” MRA called on the Federal Government to demonstrate an absolute commitment to the full and effective implementation of the FOI Act by allocating the appropriate resources required for this purpose.

According to MRA, its analysis of the 2024 Federal Government budget proposal showed that out of at least 1,316 Federal public institutions, only 10 made specific allocations for FOI implementation or other FOI-related activities in their proposals, describing the situation as an indication that the FOI Act is likely to experience another year of extremely poor performance in its implementation by government institutions and authorities.

It noted that the situation in the 2024 budget is only slightly better than what was recorded in the 2023 budget in which only nine Federal ministries, departments and agencies made specific allocations for FOI-related activities and implementation in their budget proposals.

The 10 public institutions with allocations for FOI-related expenditure in their 2024 budgets are: the National Directorate of Employment, Federal Ministry of Works, Federal Ministry of Budget and Economic Planning, Federal Ministry of Housing and Urban Development, Federal Ministry of Environment, Office of the Head of the Civil Service of the Federation, Federal Ministry of Labour and Employment, Nigerian Law Reform Commission, National Library of Nigeria, and the National Commission for Colleges of Education Secretariat.

The Federal Ministry of Works has the highest budgetary allocation for FOI implementation with a total of N39,280,000.00, while the Nigerian Law Reform Commission had the second highest allocation with a proposal to spend N15,634,545 on FOI-related activities.

MRA’s Communications Officer, Mr. Idowu Adewale, observed in the organization’s statement that a crucial consideration in ensuring the effectiveness of an FOI Law is making provisions in the budget for its implementation as this helps to ensure that the resources required to successfully implement the Law are made available.

He said:  “Without adequate investment in the implementation of the Law in order to ensure that the government is transparent and accountable, all other allocations and expenditures for infrastructure, facilities or other development projects would be at risk and could easily be misappropriated.”

Mr. Adewale argued that “The long-term benefits which the effective implementation of the FOI Act can bring to the country and its democratic process, include enhancing government transparency, efficiency and responsiveness; engendering greater public participation in governance, improving public trust and confidence in government, ensuring that members of the public have accurate and reliable information about how they are governed, and contributing to the emergence of a knowledge society”, adding that these are adequate justification for the investments required to make the Act effective.

He said it was curious that although the last report by Mr. Abubakar Malami (SAN), then Attorney-General of the Federation, which was issued on March 27, 2023, identified “inadequate or non-financial provisions to fund FOI Act activities” and a “general lack of funding for FOI activities in some public institutions” as some of the challenges impeding the effective implementation of the FOI Act, there were no concrete measures taken by the Federal Government to address the problem.

Mr. Adewale identified the absence of any specific allocation for FOI-related activities in the budget of the Federal Ministry of Justice and the Office of the Attorney-General of the Federation, as a significant concern, given the dual status of the Ministry as a public institution to which the FOI Act applies and as the body with oversight responsibility for the implementation of the Law.

Saying its funding and budgets ought to clearly reflect its dual roles and should be adequate to enable it to meet its duties and obligations with respect to each of the roles, he called on the Federal Government to provide proper guidance for public institutions on some of the considerations and steps that they need to take into account in allocating resources for FOI implementation and in ensuring that the resources are adequate.

Mr. Adewale urged the Federal Government to direct its ministries, departments and agencies to ensure that in preparing their budget proposals for subsequent fiscal years, they make provisions in the budgets to enable them carry out the full range of duties and obligations that they have under the FOI Act and also prescribe a minimum level of resources which every public institution should allocate to the implementation of the Act in order to ensure that they are fully implementing the Law and complying with its provisions.

For further information, please contact:

Idowu Adewale (Mr.)
Communications Officer,
Media Rights Agenda
E-mail: [email protected]

1234...57Page 3 of 57

AFEX is a continental network of some of the most prominent African freedom of expression and media rights advocacy organisations that are also members of IFEX, a global free expression network.

FOLLOW US

32 Otele Avenue,     East Legon, Accra, Ghana.     Tel: +233 30 255 5327     Email: info [@] africafex.org     Contact us

About us

Our network

On the issues

Our newsletter

Subscribe to our newsletter

To be updated with all the latest news, offers and special announcements.

© 2023 African Freedom of Expression Exchange